Term limits debate government exists to serve the people and not the politicians

Monthly archives Monthly archives Ballotpediaproviding an interactive almanac of Kansas state politicsincluding the Kansas Senate and the Kansas House. Featured Thoughts We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness — Declaration of Independence The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Constitution Government is essentially the negation of liberty.

Term limits debate government exists to serve the people and not the politicians

February 27, by Nicandro Iannacci The 22nd Amendment sets a two-term limit on the office of the President. Should members of the other two branches follow the same rule? Republicans, led by their presidential nominee Wendell Wilkie, campaigned against a third-term Presidentbut Roosevelt won by insisting that he was in the race to keep America out of war in Europe.

Then, ina Republican-controlled Congress sent a 22nd Amendment to the states for ratification. On February 27,the amendment was finally ratified.

Arguments for term limits

In the modern era, Americans concerned about government corruption and accountability have turned to the idea of term limits as a tool for improving the work of Congress and the Supreme Court. Indeed, Republican presidential candidates Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are among those who have expressed support for such a proposal.

Term limits debate government exists to serve the people and not the politicians

But are term limits for the legislative and judicial branches a good idea? There is certainly wide support for reform. In both polls, there were strong majorities in both parties and among independents. So what effect might term limits have?

A lack of long-serving members could reduce power advantages gained through seniority and lead to committee appointments based on merit.

Above all, supporters argue, term limits could reduce corruption and increase independence from special interests and partisanship.

On the other hand, defenders of unlimited terms point to the experience and independence gained from long service. With such a large and complicated federal bureaucracy, members are most effective—and most resistant to special interests—when they are most knowledgeable. Defenders also claim the idea is undemocratic —why shouldn't a constituency be able to reward and punish its representatives as it sees fit?

An incumbency rate well over 90 percent and the increasing levels of money in politics suggest elections may not be as effective a check on congressional failure as this argument contends. With regard to the Supreme Court, leading scholars including Erwin Chemerinsky on the left and Steven Calabresi on the right have proposed single, year terms for Justices.

Such a system would give a one-term President two appointments to the Court and a two-term President four appointments. It could lower the stakes in individual confirmation fights and reduce polarization on the Court. It could also help the Court stay in touch with larger shifts in society.

Yet as Lyle Denniston explained for this blog, Hamilton appears to take the opposite view in Federalist No. The debate rolls on. Nicandro Iannacci is a web content strategist at the National Constitution Center. Recent Stories on Constitution Daily.

· Term limits for state and local elective office are now more of the norm than not. Indeed, 36 states limit governors to two terms in office, including New Mexico. Also, about one-third of states r-bridal.com Jun 28,  · Three-quarters want term limits.

They know that term limits only cause problems for the career politicians. The last two decades have given our nation even more confidence in this gut belief.

Term limits for state and local elective office are now more of the norm than not. Indeed, 36 states limit governors to two terms in office, including New Mexico. Limiting the term in office served by elected politicians has been a controversial issue in a many countries since the early s, although not for the same reason.

In a number of countries, for example most of Latin America, politicians can only serve one term at a time in an elected office. A September article by John Fund in the National Review reports that 75 percent of the people support term limits for Congress.

Fund also details the advantages of term limits witnessed and cited by some of these same career politicians. · For those who fear term limits might reduce the relevant expertise needed to get things done I would respectfully submit that if years is not enough time for a member to master the r-bridal.com /a-time-for-congressional-term-limits.

· The topic of congressional term limits has been a hot button political issue since the early s when grass roots organizations across the country managed to put an open ended ballot question r-bridal.com

United States Senate - Wikipedia